Skip to main content

Jonathan Robinson Answers His Critics!!!!

I just can't take it any more, and I have finally snapped.

Over a year ago I did a post reviewing a TV sermon by Charles Stanley, it has consistently been one of the blog's most popular posts for the last year and has garnered an unprecedented (for Xenos) amount of anonymous comments.  I was having fun just letting it roll, but the last anonymous comment was so earnest I just couldn't help replying, and now the flood gates have opened .  I can't reply on the post because all the commentors have the same name, so I have supplied my reply in italics below the comment here.

Anonymous said...
Learn how to write before you start putting people down.
I'm sorry, I'm hoping through constructive feedback to improve in time.  Thanks for your help.
Anonymous said...
Dr. Stanley is a gifted Bible teacher. He has the love of God in him and it shines.
If you say so then I don't doubt it, it just wasn't on display that morning.  What was your name again?
Anonymous said...
You must be a muslim.
And if you think that that is an insult you must be a racist.
Anonymous said...
Amen! Preach it Brother!
Kia ora bro!
Anonymous said...
You should spend less time looking for negative things to say about Godly people and more time encouraging people!
Too right!  Although to be fair I wasn't really looking for anything negative, it was kind of hard to avoid.  Can I encourage you to stop leaving anonymous comments and be proud of your opinions?  
Anonymous said...
What qualifies you to critique a much-loved Christian teacher after watching a thirty minute broadcast? There are many tv Christian speakers. No one agrees with all of them. When you find one you don't like, change the channel. It's not hard to do. If I read your essays, I'm sure I could find something to criticize. However, on the basis of your blog, I'm not inclined to read anything else you have written. I'm trying to remember that Yes, God does love even arrogant you.
Thanks for asking.  I believe watching a program and thinking about it qualifies me to offer criticism, as to whether I am qualified enough to influence your opinion, well I'd rather you made that decision on the merits of the argument, not my credentials.  

There is more on the post but these are the ones I really needed to respond to.  Thanks for letting me get that off my chest.


  1. Very constructive and helpful responses to the comments, I think it also helps that you are very funny. Good work!

  2. Thank you so much for posting this: it made my day. [I thought better of not logging on before posting! ;)]

  3. David and Matt, thankyou so much for commenting nonymously!! Glad to share the amusement around. :-)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Dr Charles Stanley is not a biblical preacher

Unusually for me I was watching the tele early on Sunday morning and I caught an episode of Dr Charles Stanley preaching on his television program. Now I know this guy has come under some criticism for his personal life, and that is not unimportant, but it is also not something i can comment on, not knowing the facts. His preaching is however something I can comment on, at least the one sermon I did watch.

He started off by reading 2 Timothy 1:3-7. Which is a passage from the Bible, so far so good. He then spent the next 30 minutes or so talking about his mum and what a great example of a Christian mother she was. Now nothing he said or suggested was wrong, but none of it actually came from scripture, least of all the scripture he read from at the beginning. It was a lovely talk on how Stanley's mother raised him as a Christian despite considerable difficulties and it contained many useful nuggets of advice on raising Christian kids. All very nice, it might have made a nice…

The false link between suicide and mental illness

One characteristic of human society is the tendency to keep doing something over and over again despite it not working. One example would be our approach to incarcerating criminals to punish them instead of rehabilitating them, compounding their trauma and making it harder for them to live productive law-abiding lives when they get out. But this is the "common-sense" approach, the intuitive human response to the failings of others, punish them and they wont dare do it again. It has never worked, ever, but let's keep doing it. Secular society is screwed because it cannot comprehend that its vision is blurred by sin and therefore knee-jerk, common sense solutions are usually destructive and counter-productive.

So it is with our response to suicide. To kill yourself must be the response of the weak minded and sick - so the thinking goes - so to combat rising suicide we treat individuals medically. Yet suicide is a perfectly rational response to a world as broken as ours and…

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.