My supervisors were Prof Paul Trebilco & Dr James Harding.
This thesis argues for the presence of typological use of
scripture in the composition of four adjacent miracle accounts in Mark’s Gospel
(4:35-41; 5:1-20; 5:21-43; 6:30-45). I will argue that these miracle accounts
make deliberate and sustained use of literary narrative allusion to corresponding
miracle accounts from the Jewish scriptures. While some of these allusions have
been suggested before, this study argues for hitherto unnoticed allusions, as
well as a consistent compositional approach within the Gospel over several
miracles. These miracle accounts contain verbal, narrative and thematic
correspondences that, I will argue, are best explained by the presence of a scriptural
typology. This compositional approach, which is here called literary
typology, also reveals underlying theological and Christological
convictions. These convictions situate Mark’s Jesus firstly as the denouement
of salvation history through, what I will call, fulfilment typology; and
secondly identify him to an unprecedented extent with the God of Israel, which
is expressed by, what I will call, theomorphic typology.
Following an introductory chapter, it will be argued that elements
of this typological approach are evident in several early Jewish texts prior to
or contemporaneous with Mark, in order to demonstrate the historical plausibility
of Mark employing such an approach. Then, four exegetical chapters will argue for
these literary, fulfilment and theomorphic typologies in the four miracle
accounts considered. These will suggest extended typological allusions to the
scriptural narratives of Jonah, David, Elisha and Moses. They will also discuss
the hermeneutical significance of recognising each miracle’s implicit typology.
Then, a chapter will argue that this typological approach to scripture use is congruent
with scripture use in other significant episodes of Mark’s Gospel, even if it
does not follow exactly the same pattern. Finally, the results of this study
will be considered within the contemporary “early high Christology” debate,
focusing especially on the work of Richard Bauckham and Daniel Kirk. The
applicability of their respective early Jewish paradigms of “divine identity”
and “exalted human figures” to the Gospel of Mark will be evaluated. The study
will conclude that the presentation of Jesus in Mark’s Gospel is best
understood according to its own categories and not according to those distilled
from the diverse corpus of extant early Jewish writings. Thus, this thesis
seeks to make an original contribution to the scholarly understanding of
miracles, use of scripture, and Christology in the Gospel of Mark.