Skip to main content

Piper on God's God-centredness

A nice concise 7 point argument, by John Piper, on:

Why God is not a megalomaniac in demanding to be worshipped

Let me know what you think :)


  1. Yes very thought provoking. I can't say I fully disagree with him but I think he misses the wood for the trees.
    Looking at thesis two "Q 1: What is the chief end of God?". I'm no theologian and although the bible gives us glimpses I'm not sure it equips us to answer this. The the two greatest commandments... love God etc. and love your neighbour... I can firmly grasp.
    So going back to his first thesis I would think that God is all about relationships and love not so specifically worship. Worship is a natural outcome of loving God with all our heart, souls and strength as is glorifying and exalting His name. God desires a relationship from all his creation and so that's why he needs his name to be known on Earth.
    So this leads us to the second greatest commandment... to love others. Worshipping God not only strengthens our relationship with God but also acts as a witness to those who don't know God or the saving grace of Jesus Christ. Thus bringing them into a relationship with God.
    However, this consequently means God is “worshipped with a white hot intensity”.

  2. Hi Fiona, welcome :) Yes I know what you mean, I am not sure it is proper to talk about God having an 'end'. God's is the one existence that needs no cause, purpose, or reason, God just is. So God can have no beginning or end. But I really like what Piper said about not having a human-centred God, which makes our worship ultimately human-centred too. God is definately not just about making humans happy. We may start worshipping God because of what God has done for us, but we must end up worshpping God because of who God is.

  3. I could see where he was coming from but I think it's a particularly contrived view. He seems to have just picked all the quotes that suit his argument.

    I've been having a questioning discussion with my 4 year old recently about God.. in ways only a 4 year old can. Like can God see through walls etc... The whole concept that God is God... he's not a man with special powers.. was a difficult one. But to me it showed the simplicity of how we try to make God what we want to be, rather than as you've just said Jon, God just is.

  4. Thanks for including these Jonathan.
    I have to admit that I am struggling a bit with the flippancy with which Piper makes some of his statements. The way he has described God is as a megalomaniac, so how can he then say that he isn't? God has provided us with the ability to discern righteousness from evil (even if we don't always choose right) and I find it frustrating when I see evil attributed to God but re-defined as good just to make it fit our concept of God. (I hope that I haven't confused you)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Dr Charles Stanley is not a biblical preacher

Unusually for me I was watching the tele early on Sunday morning and I caught an episode of Dr Charles Stanley preaching on his television program. Now I know this guy has come under some criticism for his personal life, and that is not unimportant, but it is also not something i can comment on, not knowing the facts. His preaching is however something I can comment on, at least the one sermon I did watch.

He started off by reading 2 Timothy 1:3-7. Which is a passage from the Bible, so far so good. He then spent the next 30 minutes or so talking about his mum and what a great example of a Christian mother she was. Now nothing he said or suggested was wrong, but none of it actually came from scripture, least of all the scripture he read from at the beginning. It was a lovely talk on how Stanley's mother raised him as a Christian despite considerable difficulties and it contained many useful nuggets of advice on raising Christian kids. All very nice, it might have made a nice…

That one time Jesus got the Bible wrong

It's so typical isn't it? You are preaching all day long, training your disciples, sparring with the Pharisees, encouraging the poor and down trodden, healing the sick and casting out demons, all day, day after day, and even when you go up a mountain to get a rest the crowds hunt you down and follow you up, and then the one time you get a bit muddled up with some of the details of a biblical text . . . that is the one they write down in the first gospel - verbatim. At least Matthew and Luke had the good sense to do some editing. But Mark, he always had his eye on giving the public the "historical Jesus" whoever that is supposed to be . . . warts and all. Thanks a lot Mark!

Some think I made the mistake on purpose, just to show the Pharisees up.

For some there is no mistake worth mentioning, only a slightly ambiguous turn of phrase.

Others think I am doing something tricky with Abiathar's name, getting him to figuratively stand in for the priesthood.

It really has…

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.