[pic from here]I know a number of people who read this blog are concerned how to understand the fall if theistic evolution is accepted. Peter Enns offers here one suggestion for a way forward [HT Mike]. Very, very, interesting stuff. Enns is planning to follow up by looking at Paul's understanding of Adam. One idea I have for a project after I finish my MTh is to do a study of how Gen 1 and Gen 2-3 are treated in Second Temple Judaism as an attempt to understand why Paul uses Gen 2-3 so much but never goes near the theologically fertile ground of Gen 1 (unlike the gospel of John for instance). Or am I wrong about that? Any thoughts?