Richard Hays in The Moral Vision of the New Testament, (p202) gives three reasons why "love" is inadequate as a unifying theme for NT ethics (and by implication why it is inadequate for ethics today).
1. Mark, Acts, Hebrews, and Revelation "resist any attempt to sythesze their moral visions by employing love as a focal image . . . Despite the powerful theological uses to which the motif of love is put by Paul and John, that motif cannot serve as the common denominator for New Testament Ethics." Instead Hays suggests "community, cross and new creation."
2. "What the New testament means by love is embodied in the concretely in the cross." and so to treat love apart from the cross is to result in "conceptual abstraction, away from the specific image of the cross."
3. "The term ["love"] has become debased in popular discourse; it has lost its power of discrimination, having become a cover for all manner of vapid self indulgence." "We can recover the power of love only by insisting that love's meaning is to be discovered in the New Testament's story of Jesus - therefore, in the cross."
So who do you believe, Hays or the Beatles?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jesus treats the Syrophoenecian Woman as a Disciple
[This is an extract from my essay "Breaking Bread: The Power of Hospitality in the Gospel of Mark" which you can read in full and ...
-
I know it has been a lean year for my long suffering blog readers, but as a sign i still love you, and that the rivers of xenos have not yet...
-
James McGrath's blog really is a mighty blog. He is single handedly responsible for sending over 80 readers to this weeks carnival. If y...
-
Congrats to Myk Habets on the release of his book, The Anointed Son: A Trinitarian Spirit Christology . I've just ordered my copy, a...
Hmmm...I guess I'm not sure I understand how love cannot be seen as adequate to unify NT ethics.
ReplyDeleteFor instance, "community" without love is little more than a mob; the cross, unless motivated by love, was pointless; a new creation not characterized by love will degenerate as the old one.
As far as ethics proper go, I guess I'd have to read the book to see how Hays thinks the cross and "new creation" impacts ethics.
Clarification?