Skip to main content

Roger Olsen's Anti-Militant-Calvinist Manifesto

. . . is well worth a read.  He starts like this,

For many years I had no particular bone to pick with Calvinism. I required my students to read Calvin (as I still do) and Calvinist theologians, and invited Calvinists into my classes to explain their theology (as I still do). Some of my relatives are Calvinists, as have been many of my friends. Then something new began to happen. One day in the early 1990s I read an article on line in which a leading Reformed theologian stated that a person cannot be both evangelical and Arminian. He equated Arminianism with Roman Catholic theology and called it semi-Pelagianism.
If this were an isolated incident that would be one thing. But relatively quickly this sentiment about Calvinism and Arminianism began to sweep through evangelicalism. And the Calvinism being promoted as synonymous with evangelical Christianity itself was and is a particular strain of Calvinism that highlights and underscores double predestination.

You can't comment on the webpage so feel free to do so here! :-)

Comments

  1. Interesting article Jonathan. I'm glad that there are people like Roger around!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Indeed, I might have to start subscribing to his blog, only problem is too many blogs!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good article.

    I was a Calvinist for about 6 weeks once, when I was studying. But it was the exegesis of those Romans passages that helped me understand Paul was talking about Gentiles being ingrafted into Israel - not God predetermining the salvation of individuals - that changed my mind.

    By the way, at the Gathering I went to a seminar featuring 5 Carey staff, and found it pretty interesting that 3 seemed to be Calvinists. It's definitely a theology on the rise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Rhett, be interested to discuss that with you, off blog of course, I think the Calvinists at Carey though are all people i am happy to get on with; even the most rabid, and you know who i mean, is actually a very open minded and intelligent Calvinist who is a long way from the TULIP nonsense and "federal" Calvinism. I would struggle to pass a piece of paper between my arminianism and any intelligent Calvinists I know, except maybe you know who, but even then I feel i have more in common with them than not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. and yes, reading Romans properly makes a big difference. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oh yeah - absolutely. I didn't mean it in a bad way, just as an observation... some of my best friends are Calvinists! ;-)

    But seriously, John Stott is my favourite Christian writer and he was something of a fuzzy Calvinist. Tim Keller is brilliant as well, and he's a not so fuzzy Calvinist. I've even been known to read John Piper and enjoy myself.

    So no "us vs them" coming from me here!

    ReplyDelete
  7. :-) Yes sorry, i was clarifying my own poistion, not worried about yours, i know what an irenic chap you are. The discussion would be that i'm genuinly interested to know who you reckon is a calvinist and who isn't, unfortunately they don't wear badges.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.

The false link between suicide and mental illness

One characteristic of human society is the tendency to keep doing something over and over again despite it not working. One example would be our approach to incarcerating criminals to punish them instead of rehabilitating them, compounding their trauma and making it harder for them to live productive law-abiding lives when they get out. But this is the "common-sense" approach, the intuitive human response to the failings of others, punish them and they wont dare do it again. It has never worked, ever, but let's keep doing it. Secular society is screwed because it cannot comprehend that its vision is blurred by sin and therefore knee-jerk, common sense solutions are usually destructive and counter-productive.

So it is with our response to suicide. To kill yourself must be the response of the weak minded and sick - so the thinking goes - so to combat rising suicide we treat individuals medically. Yet suicide is a perfectly rational response to a world as broken as ours and…

Wars and Rumours of Wars

I write in the morning after the USA 2016 Elections, which featured the historic election of Donald Trump. Apart from my personal interested as a resident of planet Earth at this time, it is interesting to note some of the apocalyptic language emerging in discussions of what this means. Even archaeologists are turning to the medium of prophecy. Hear the word of Tobias Stone,
So I feel it’s all inevitable. I don’t know what it will be, but we are entering a bad phase. It will be unpleasant for those living through it, maybe even will unravel into being hellish and beyond imagination. Humans will come out the other side, recover and move on.  Stone suggests that future historians will be able to draw clear lines from Brexit to Trump to the 3rd World War, or something equally bad. Mind you, just because historians can draw those lines doesn't mean they are here.

Then there is the word of Thom Hartman who is more interested in the domestic fallout than the fallout shelter. 
The last …