Skip to main content

Roger Olsen's Anti-Militant-Calvinist Manifesto

. . . is well worth a read.  He starts like this,

For many years I had no particular bone to pick with Calvinism. I required my students to read Calvin (as I still do) and Calvinist theologians, and invited Calvinists into my classes to explain their theology (as I still do). Some of my relatives are Calvinists, as have been many of my friends. Then something new began to happen. One day in the early 1990s I read an article on line in which a leading Reformed theologian stated that a person cannot be both evangelical and Arminian. He equated Arminianism with Roman Catholic theology and called it semi-Pelagianism.
If this were an isolated incident that would be one thing. But relatively quickly this sentiment about Calvinism and Arminianism began to sweep through evangelicalism. And the Calvinism being promoted as synonymous with evangelical Christianity itself was and is a particular strain of Calvinism that highlights and underscores double predestination.

You can't comment on the webpage so feel free to do so here! :-)


  1. Interesting article Jonathan. I'm glad that there are people like Roger around!!

  2. Indeed, I might have to start subscribing to his blog, only problem is too many blogs!

  3. Good article.

    I was a Calvinist for about 6 weeks once, when I was studying. But it was the exegesis of those Romans passages that helped me understand Paul was talking about Gentiles being ingrafted into Israel - not God predetermining the salvation of individuals - that changed my mind.

    By the way, at the Gathering I went to a seminar featuring 5 Carey staff, and found it pretty interesting that 3 seemed to be Calvinists. It's definitely a theology on the rise.

  4. Hi Rhett, be interested to discuss that with you, off blog of course, I think the Calvinists at Carey though are all people i am happy to get on with; even the most rabid, and you know who i mean, is actually a very open minded and intelligent Calvinist who is a long way from the TULIP nonsense and "federal" Calvinism. I would struggle to pass a piece of paper between my arminianism and any intelligent Calvinists I know, except maybe you know who, but even then I feel i have more in common with them than not.

  5. and yes, reading Romans properly makes a big difference. :-)

  6. Oh yeah - absolutely. I didn't mean it in a bad way, just as an observation... some of my best friends are Calvinists! ;-)

    But seriously, John Stott is my favourite Christian writer and he was something of a fuzzy Calvinist. Tim Keller is brilliant as well, and he's a not so fuzzy Calvinist. I've even been known to read John Piper and enjoy myself.

    So no "us vs them" coming from me here!

  7. :-) Yes sorry, i was clarifying my own poistion, not worried about yours, i know what an irenic chap you are. The discussion would be that i'm genuinly interested to know who you reckon is a calvinist and who isn't, unfortunately they don't wear badges.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That one time Jesus got the Bible wrong

It's so typical isn't it? You are preaching all day long, training your disciples, sparring with the Pharisees, encouraging the poor and down trodden, healing the sick and casting out demons, all day, day after day, and even when you go up a mountain to get a rest the crowds hunt you down and follow you up, and then the one time you get a bit muddled up with some of the details of a biblical text . . . that is the one they write down in the first gospel - verbatim. At least Matthew and Luke had the good sense to do some editing. But Mark, he always had his eye on giving the public the "historical Jesus" whoever that is supposed to be . . . warts and all. Thanks a lot Mark!

Some think I made the mistake on purpose, just to show the Pharisees up.

For some there is no mistake worth mentioning, only a slightly ambiguous turn of phrase.

Others think I am doing something tricky with Abiathar's name, getting him to figuratively stand in for the priesthood.

It really has…

Thor Ragnarok and Parihaka: Postcolonial Apocalypse

Thor: Ragnarok is a riot of colour, sound, violence, humour, sci-fi and fantasy. As a piece of entertainment it is the best Marvel has produced so far. As in many of Taika Waititi's films the plot often seems secondary to the humour and a number of quirky moments seemed only to serve for a quick giggle. I left the theatre overwhelmed by the sensory experience, but ultimately unimpressed by any deeper meaning.

It wasn't until the second morning after my trip to the movies that I woke to the realisation that the movie could function as a profound postcolonial metaphor (I do some of my best thinking while alseep, also it can take me a while for the penny to drop). Unfortunately a quick google showed me that I was neither the first, nor the second to have this thought.

[Spoiler Alert!]

It's easy to miss with all the other stuff going on but Thor undergoes a postcolonial awakening during the film as he slowly realises that his beloved Asgard and its dominion of the nine realms …

Dale Martin does Mark

Dale Martin is an important and frequently controversial NT scholar. Those of us who can't make it to Yale to hear him teach can access some of his lectures, in fact his entire introduction to the NT course, through the magic of the internet.

Here he is holding forth on Mark . . .