Skip to main content

Roger Olsen's Anti-Militant-Calvinist Manifesto

. . . is well worth a read.  He starts like this,

For many years I had no particular bone to pick with Calvinism. I required my students to read Calvin (as I still do) and Calvinist theologians, and invited Calvinists into my classes to explain their theology (as I still do). Some of my relatives are Calvinists, as have been many of my friends. Then something new began to happen. One day in the early 1990s I read an article on line in which a leading Reformed theologian stated that a person cannot be both evangelical and Arminian. He equated Arminianism with Roman Catholic theology and called it semi-Pelagianism.
If this were an isolated incident that would be one thing. But relatively quickly this sentiment about Calvinism and Arminianism began to sweep through evangelicalism. And the Calvinism being promoted as synonymous with evangelical Christianity itself was and is a particular strain of Calvinism that highlights and underscores double predestination.

You can't comment on the webpage so feel free to do so here! :-)


  1. Interesting article Jonathan. I'm glad that there are people like Roger around!!

  2. Indeed, I might have to start subscribing to his blog, only problem is too many blogs!

  3. Good article.

    I was a Calvinist for about 6 weeks once, when I was studying. But it was the exegesis of those Romans passages that helped me understand Paul was talking about Gentiles being ingrafted into Israel - not God predetermining the salvation of individuals - that changed my mind.

    By the way, at the Gathering I went to a seminar featuring 5 Carey staff, and found it pretty interesting that 3 seemed to be Calvinists. It's definitely a theology on the rise.

  4. Hi Rhett, be interested to discuss that with you, off blog of course, I think the Calvinists at Carey though are all people i am happy to get on with; even the most rabid, and you know who i mean, is actually a very open minded and intelligent Calvinist who is a long way from the TULIP nonsense and "federal" Calvinism. I would struggle to pass a piece of paper between my arminianism and any intelligent Calvinists I know, except maybe you know who, but even then I feel i have more in common with them than not.

  5. and yes, reading Romans properly makes a big difference. :-)

  6. Oh yeah - absolutely. I didn't mean it in a bad way, just as an observation... some of my best friends are Calvinists! ;-)

    But seriously, John Stott is my favourite Christian writer and he was something of a fuzzy Calvinist. Tim Keller is brilliant as well, and he's a not so fuzzy Calvinist. I've even been known to read John Piper and enjoy myself.

    So no "us vs them" coming from me here!

  7. :-) Yes sorry, i was clarifying my own poistion, not worried about yours, i know what an irenic chap you are. The discussion would be that i'm genuinly interested to know who you reckon is a calvinist and who isn't, unfortunately they don't wear badges.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Dr Charles Stanley is not a biblical preacher

Unusually for me I was watching the tele early on Sunday morning and I caught an episode of Dr Charles Stanley preaching on his television program. Now I know this guy has come under some criticism for his personal life, and that is not unimportant, but it is also not something i can comment on, not knowing the facts. His preaching is however something I can comment on, at least the one sermon I did watch.

He started off by reading 2 Timothy 1:3-7. Which is a passage from the Bible, so far so good. He then spent the next 30 minutes or so talking about his mum and what a great example of a Christian mother she was. Now nothing he said or suggested was wrong, but none of it actually came from scripture, least of all the scripture he read from at the beginning. It was a lovely talk on how Stanley's mother raised him as a Christian despite considerable difficulties and it contained many useful nuggets of advice on raising Christian kids. All very nice, it might have made a nice…

The false link between suicide and mental illness

One characteristic of human society is the tendency to keep doing something over and over again despite it not working. One example would be our approach to incarcerating criminals to punish them instead of rehabilitating them, compounding their trauma and making it harder for them to live productive law-abiding lives when they get out. But this is the "common-sense" approach, the intuitive human response to the failings of others, punish them and they wont dare do it again. It has never worked, ever, but let's keep doing it. Secular society is screwed because it cannot comprehend that its vision is blurred by sin and therefore knee-jerk, common sense solutions are usually destructive and counter-productive.

So it is with our response to suicide. To kill yourself must be the response of the weak minded and sick - so the thinking goes - so to combat rising suicide we treat individuals medically. Yet suicide is a perfectly rational response to a world as broken as ours and…

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.