Skip to main content

When blogging fails


Extraordinary!  Tom Wright actually takes the time to reply to a blogpost about his views on justification and gets completely ignored by those discussing him. And then he even comes back again, but only manages to inspire some guy to tell him to take up blogging. D'oh! I can't help but feel we missed an opportunity to convert another scholar to the ranks of bibliobloggers, and what a trophy convert he would be.  :-D

Comments

  1. I noticed the same thing about the complete lack of interaction with his comment. It was weird. I'm pretty sure that I'd notice if Tom Wright made a comment on my blog.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I felt like leaving a comment saying, "come to me Tom and I'll interact with you!"

    but then i thought it might sound a bit creepy :-)

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's amazing that Denny approved it at all. He's notorious for moderating dissenters into oblivion.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Unbelievable what a missed opportunity!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well it does make you wonder about how open some people really are to discussion. I guess it must be nice to have all the answers and know you can't possibly have anything to learn, even from NT wright. I know a four year old girl like that, but i'm hoping she'll grow out of it!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I truly live in an entirely different cognitive world from people who debate the meaning of the word "basis" and think that such a debate has something to do with God's salvation for all of creation. And I'm glad that (I believe that) God is bigger than such a etymological debate.

    I'm a big fan of Wright and his New Perspective and I loved he remark about trying to fit Paul into a dogmatic framework. :-) Or God, even.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey Pam, i totally agree, although I think there might also be a gender divide on the subject, i've only ever seen men get hot under the collar on such issues!

    ReplyDelete
  8. although I think there might also be a gender divide on the subject, i've only ever seen men get hot under the collar on such issues!

    This is probably a lot more than just a throw-away remark which could yield some investigation in several different directions.

    In my opinion as a (mere) woman, I have a personal theory that a lot of these debates are had by people with fairly extreme sensing-thinking personality-types and that these individuals are more likely to be men. (Both nature and nurture here, I suspect.)

    It was not so long ago in human history that moral philosophers and psychologists drew conclusions such as "Woman are more likely than men to break rules or laws out of compassion - e.g. stealing medication to saved a loved one's life - therefore women have a less-developed sense of morality. So ethics derived from linear thought-forms but divorced from context was considered the highest form of goodness and morality but contextual morality that prioritized human life was an inferior form of morality.

    One of my favourite preachers, the Franciscan Richard Rohr, says that he thinks that the reason Jesus was a male was that if a woman had gone around preaching service and pacifism and the last shall be first, everyone would have said "Yeah, yeah typical woman".

    ReplyDelete
  9. Pam, trust you to write a better and more interesting post in the comments than my original post! :-)
    Thanks for that.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That one time Jesus got the Bible wrong

It's so typical isn't it? You are preaching all day long, training your disciples, sparring with the Pharisees, encouraging the poor and down trodden, healing the sick and casting out demons, all day, day after day, and even when you go up a mountain to get a rest the crowds hunt you down and follow you up, and then the one time you get a bit muddled up with some of the details of a biblical text . . . that is the one they write down in the first gospel - verbatim. At least Matthew and Luke had the good sense to do some editing. But Mark, he always had his eye on giving the public the "historical Jesus" whoever that is supposed to be . . . warts and all. Thanks a lot Mark!

Some think I made the mistake on purpose, just to show the Pharisees up.

For some there is no mistake worth mentioning, only a slightly ambiguous turn of phrase.

Others think I am doing something tricky with Abiathar's name, getting him to figuratively stand in for the priesthood.

It really has…

Thor Ragnarok and Parihaka: Postcolonial Apocalypse

Thor: Ragnarok is a riot of colour, sound, violence, humour, sci-fi and fantasy. As a piece of entertainment it is the best Marvel has produced so far. As in many of Taika Waititi's films the plot often seems secondary to the humour and a number of quirky moments seemed only to serve for a quick giggle. I left the theatre overwhelmed by the sensory experience, but ultimately unimpressed by any deeper meaning.

It wasn't until the second morning after my trip to the movies that I woke to the realisation that the movie could function as a profound postcolonial metaphor (I do some of my best thinking while alseep, also it can take me a while for the penny to drop). Unfortunately a quick google showed me that I was neither the first, nor the second to have this thought.

[Spoiler Alert!]

It's easy to miss with all the other stuff going on but Thor undergoes a postcolonial awakening during the film as he slowly realises that his beloved Asgard and its dominion of the nine realms …

Dale Martin does Mark

Dale Martin is an important and frequently controversial NT scholar. Those of us who can't make it to Yale to hear him teach can access some of his lectures, in fact his entire introduction to the NT course, through the magic of the internet.

Here he is holding forth on Mark . . .