Skip to main content

Team Tower Challenge



This is a team building/leadership exercise or game with a point (and as many twists as you like). But you don't have to do it for the point it is fun in itself. Also there'll be other points you could make out of it. I ran this last night for three teams of 4-5 and had screens up so that they couldn't see what the other teams were doing. It was lots of fun (and this was a group of adults not kids),





1. Each team is given a bag of building material. Each team needs to be given the same amount and type of material. I used dominoes, playing cards, drinking straws and hair ties. You could use any number of other items, most obvious being kids building blocks. There are more opportunities for imaginative engineering if there are different sorts of material.

2. Each team chooses a leader.

3. The teams are told that they will be building a tower out of the material, but that the criteria for that tower will only be told to the leaders who are not allowed to speak (or lip sync) or touch the building or the team.

4. The leaders are taken aside and given the criteria for winning that round of construction.

5. The teams then have 5 minutes to build a tower under the guidance of their leader.

6. When the time is up teams step away from the tower, the criteria for the towers is revealed to everybody and the towers are judged.

The first time round the criteria for the tower was
"Build the tallest tower without using the drinking straws"  - This was pretty easy although banning the straws meant that the easiest way to gain hight was dissallowed.

The second time I made them choose new leaders, the criteria this time was
"Build the tower that is the tallest after I have dropped a large book on the table from a height." - This time the criteria was harder to convey and some leaders opted to merely show what sort of tower they wanted built (which of course circumvented the engineering ideas of the team) while other tried to convey the impending catastrophe and created some confusion. (NB. I used Grout's History of Western Music rather than a Study Bible for reasons of respect.)

Now in this instance it was a quick game to make the point that if you know something bad is about to happen you build your tower differently, we were discussing discipleship that built "earthquake proof" faith in people.  But I think simply as a team building game you could have a lot of fun with this, the more complicated the criteria for each round the more opportunity for confusion and fun. One such criteria would be to build the tower on someone's back and another would be to make a Stone Henge rather than a tower. also changing which items are banned from round to round messes with their head as in round two 2/3 teams failed to use the straws.

Have fun, and if you use it leave me a comment and let me know how it went.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Dr Charles Stanley is not a biblical preacher

Unusually for me I was watching the tele early on Sunday morning and I caught an episode of Dr Charles Stanley preaching on his television program. Now I know this guy has come under some criticism for his personal life, and that is not unimportant, but it is also not something i can comment on, not knowing the facts. His preaching is however something I can comment on, at least the one sermon I did watch.

He started off by reading 2 Timothy 1:3-7. Which is a passage from the Bible, so far so good. He then spent the next 30 minutes or so talking about his mum and what a great example of a Christian mother she was. Now nothing he said or suggested was wrong, but none of it actually came from scripture, least of all the scripture he read from at the beginning. It was a lovely talk on how Stanley's mother raised him as a Christian despite considerable difficulties and it contained many useful nuggets of advice on raising Christian kids. All very nice, it might have made a nice…

The false link between suicide and mental illness

One characteristic of human society is the tendency to keep doing something over and over again despite it not working. One example would be our approach to incarcerating criminals to punish them instead of rehabilitating them, compounding their trauma and making it harder for them to live productive law-abiding lives when they get out. But this is the "common-sense" approach, the intuitive human response to the failings of others, punish them and they wont dare do it again. It has never worked, ever, but let's keep doing it. Secular society is screwed because it cannot comprehend that its vision is blurred by sin and therefore knee-jerk, common sense solutions are usually destructive and counter-productive.

So it is with our response to suicide. To kill yourself must be the response of the weak minded and sick - so the thinking goes - so to combat rising suicide we treat individuals medically. Yet suicide is a perfectly rational response to a world as broken as ours and…

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.