Skip to main content

Team Tower Challenge



This is a team building/leadership exercise or game with a point (and as many twists as you like). But you don't have to do it for the point it is fun in itself. Also there'll be other points you could make out of it. I ran this last night for three teams of 4-5 and had screens up so that they couldn't see what the other teams were doing. It was lots of fun (and this was a group of adults not kids),





1. Each team is given a bag of building material. Each team needs to be given the same amount and type of material. I used dominoes, playing cards, drinking straws and hair ties. You could use any number of other items, most obvious being kids building blocks. There are more opportunities for imaginative engineering if there are different sorts of material.

2. Each team chooses a leader.

3. The teams are told that they will be building a tower out of the material, but that the criteria for that tower will only be told to the leaders who are not allowed to speak (or lip sync) or touch the building or the team.

4. The leaders are taken aside and given the criteria for winning that round of construction.

5. The teams then have 5 minutes to build a tower under the guidance of their leader.

6. When the time is up teams step away from the tower, the criteria for the towers is revealed to everybody and the towers are judged.

The first time round the criteria for the tower was
"Build the tallest tower without using the drinking straws"  - This was pretty easy although banning the straws meant that the easiest way to gain hight was dissallowed.

The second time I made them choose new leaders, the criteria this time was
"Build the tower that is the tallest after I have dropped a large book on the table from a height." - This time the criteria was harder to convey and some leaders opted to merely show what sort of tower they wanted built (which of course circumvented the engineering ideas of the team) while other tried to convey the impending catastrophe and created some confusion. (NB. I used Grout's History of Western Music rather than a Study Bible for reasons of respect.)

Now in this instance it was a quick game to make the point that if you know something bad is about to happen you build your tower differently, we were discussing discipleship that built "earthquake proof" faith in people.  But I think simply as a team building game you could have a lot of fun with this, the more complicated the criteria for each round the more opportunity for confusion and fun. One such criteria would be to build the tower on someone's back and another would be to make a Stone Henge rather than a tower. also changing which items are banned from round to round messes with their head as in round two 2/3 teams failed to use the straws.

Have fun, and if you use it leave me a comment and let me know how it went.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ANZABS 2018 program and abstracts

ANZABS CONFERENCE 2018
6-7 December, 2018


Venue: Wesley Hall, Trinity Methodist College,

202A St Johns Rd, Meadowbank, Auckland 1072

Thursday 6 December
9.30 am – REGISTRATION
10.00-10.10 – mihi
10.10-11.00 – Keynote speaker: Robert Myles – Fishing for Eyewitnesses in the Fourth Gospel
11.00-11.30 – Morning tea
11.30-12.00 – Lyndon Drake – Economic Capital in the Hebrew Bible
12.00-12.30 – Anne Aalbers – Resurrection and Celibacy: Two Sides of the Same Coin?
12.30-1.00 – Jonathan Robinson – "And he was with the beasts," (Mark 1:13): Ambiguity,
Interpretation and Mark as a Jewish Author
1.00-2.00 – Lunch
2.00-2.30 – Ben Hudson – Ethical Exhortation and the Decalogue in Ephesians
2.30-3.00 – Csilla Saysell – The Servant as 'a covenant of/for people' in Deutero-Isaiah
3.00-3.30 – Afternoon tea
3.30-4.00 – Jacqueline Lloyd – Did Jesus minister in Gaulanitis?
4.00-4.30 – Mark Keown – Jesus as the New Joshua
4.30 – AGM
Friday 7 December
9.30-10.00 – Ben Ong – Pākehā Readin…

Updated Current Research and Book Reviews

So, my PhD must be going well because I have just spent the morning updating my blog pages for Current Research and brand spanking new Book Reviews page. But it is not just procrastination, it is good to stop and and get an overview.

I had totally forgotten about half the book reviews I had done on this blog, they go back to 2009! I am still working on writing the sort of reviews I really enjoy reading, but now that I'm regularly doing reviews for journals it is great to also review books on this blog where I have stylistic freedom and no space limitations. I had always hoped this blog would be a good source of free books, but while it was a source of free books they were not good ones. Reviewing for journals (as a PhD student) has been much better and is helping me keep my broader education going even as I delve deep into my PhD subject. Looking at my old book reviews helps me realise how far I have come. Hopefully, much growth as a blogger, scholar and human being (perhaps not i…

Again, on Mark 2:23-28

I think this is different enough to the "solutions" shared earlier to be worth a post. I'm afraid I haven't had a chance to absorb it yet, been reading too much today, so I can't say if I think he is on to something or not, but do let me know what you think :-)


James M. Hamilton Jr. in "The Typology of David's Rise to Power: Messianic Patterns in the Book of Samuel" JSBT 16, 2012, 4-25, at p13 writes,

Considering the way that Jesus appeals to the Davidic type in Mark 2:23-28, Goppelt draws attention to the way that Jesus not only makes a connection between himself and David in Mark 2:25, he also links his disciples to “those who were with [David].”70 This would seem to invite Mark’s audience to make other connections between those involved in these two events. Much discussion has been generated by the fact that Mark 2:26 portrays Jesus referring to “the time of Abiathar the high priest,” when it appears that at the time, Ahimelech would have been the…