- In biblical thought both the body and soul sin, in platonic thought the body is sinful, the soul pure.
- In biblical thought the soul survives the body but is diminished by the loss, in platonic thought the soul is liberated by the loss.
- In biblical thought salvation is either the preservation or the reunification of the body and soul, in platonic thought it is a purely spiritual affair.
- In biblical thought 'you' are truly your body and soul, but for the platonist 'you,' the soul, have a body.
Of course ancient Greek thought was pretty diverse and so any generalisations are by nature somewhat blunt and inaccurate.
hmmm... interesting again.
ReplyDeleteOn OT anthropology, wouldn't the four-fold parallelism in the Shema (heart, soul, mind, strength) reinforce the 'integrated' view you outline here?
On that last bullet point: I'm interested in how C.S. Lewis might respond (particularly in light of his quote: "You don't have a soul, you are a Soul. You have a body.")
Yes, CS Lewis is a classic example of someone who was very Platonic in his Christianity, and you can see this in a lot of his work. He came to Christ in the middle of a career as a classicist and I think you often find him making assumptions about the gospel that come from a more platonic source than a really scriptural one. But it's often quite subtle. I think CS Lewis was great in his day, but too many today build on his work uncritically, and that CS Lewis quote is a classic one for being bandied about by people who think it sounds good but haven't weiged its truth against biblical teaching. thanks Dale
ReplyDeleteInteresting - Is there a sense in which that Lewis quote can still be understood to be referring to a biblical understanding of an integrated anthropology? Using 'soul' as a kind of umbrella term for 'me' and seeing that a 'soul' has a spirit and body, etc.?
ReplyDeletei.e.:
a "soul" characterised by duality between:
spirit (mind, 'heart', 'strength')
body (brain, blood-pumper, muscle, etc.)
(I'm typing out loud, I suppose)
well I have no doubt that Lewis did not intend it that way. but you can if you want i suppose!
ReplyDelete