Skip to main content

Davidson, A Public Faith: A Book Review






I try and read at least one church history book a year.  Every time I do it always amazes me how different the perspective of a different historian can be.  Ivor Davidson is head of St Andrew's divinty school at the moment although he used to be at Otago in NZ.  Davidson's book is part of an 8 part Monarch History of the Church, so this book covers 312-600AD (actually we get well into the 600s by the end of the book) and so is a nice medium between one volume church histories and a more detailed study on one characer or controversy.  I picked this up in the bargain bin at my local Christian bookstore and have been glad I did.  On the strength of this one I'll be looking out for the others in the series. 



Davidson accomplishes the usual survey of historical theological disputes in 7 of the 14 chapters.  The writing is engaging and Davidson is admirably evenhanded taking care not expose and explain the political influences on the debates and their results but without overstating them.  He is careful to locate each theological dispute in its context.  Davidson's phd is in patristics and this shows up in his affectionate and assured handling of the church fathers.  The emporers, from Constantine onward, are also major characters.  Davidson clearly has his own opinions on the theological subjects and isn't shy of exposing his own bias, but usually only towards the end of chapters and certainly not in a way that suggests it affects his portrayal of the protagonists. 

The other 7 chapters help keep the book really interesting, taking on either broad surveys or more detailed examinations of certain areas.  For example, chapters on Christian ascetics, worship, barbarian Europe and the spread of christianity in England.  Those chapters help the book go into areas that (at least in my limited reading in Church history) tend to get sidelined and certainly kept things interesting.

Given that this is more of a survey of a historical period the book's primary thesis is that the era 312-600 represents the church going public (with emperial support) and that this new public persona for the church was a mixed blessing. I doubt it is a thesis anyone sensible would quibble with but as a deliniation of the ways in which the church's public character both brought opportunities for the gospel and resulted in compromises of the gospel A Public Faith is excellent.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Addictive Power of End Times Speculation

The mighty Rhett Snell has picked up his blog again (I wonder how long he'll last this time), check out his theory on why people get so into annoyingly unbiblical end times nonsense.

I think that where codes-and-calendars end times theology is dangerous, is that it can give a sense of false growth. We read a theory online, or hear it from some bible teacher, and we come to think that we have mastered an area of our faith. A bit like levelling up in a computer game, or Popeye after he’s eaten some spinach. At worst, we begin to believe that we’ve taken a step that other Christians have not; that we’ve entered an elite class of Christianity.

The false link between suicide and mental illness

One characteristic of human society is the tendency to keep doing something over and over again despite it not working. One example would be our approach to incarcerating criminals to punish them instead of rehabilitating them, compounding their trauma and making it harder for them to live productive law-abiding lives when they get out. But this is the "common-sense" approach, the intuitive human response to the failings of others, punish them and they wont dare do it again. It has never worked, ever, but let's keep doing it. Secular society is screwed because it cannot comprehend that its vision is blurred by sin and therefore knee-jerk, common sense solutions are usually destructive and counter-productive.

So it is with our response to suicide. To kill yourself must be the response of the weak minded and sick - so the thinking goes - so to combat rising suicide we treat individuals medically. Yet suicide is a perfectly rational response to a world as broken as ours and…

Wars and Rumours of Wars

I write in the morning after the USA 2016 Elections, which featured the historic election of Donald Trump. Apart from my personal interested as a resident of planet Earth at this time, it is interesting to note some of the apocalyptic language emerging in discussions of what this means. Even archaeologists are turning to the medium of prophecy. Hear the word of Tobias Stone,
So I feel it’s all inevitable. I don’t know what it will be, but we are entering a bad phase. It will be unpleasant for those living through it, maybe even will unravel into being hellish and beyond imagination. Humans will come out the other side, recover and move on.  Stone suggests that future historians will be able to draw clear lines from Brexit to Trump to the 3rd World War, or something equally bad. Mind you, just because historians can draw those lines doesn't mean they are here.

Then there is the word of Thom Hartman who is more interested in the domestic fallout than the fallout shelter. 
The last …