Skip to main content

Humanism, Creationism, Lies, and Jesus

Blinded by the Olympics and far enough away not to hear the noise many of us in the Antipodes will have missed the hue and cry in the United Kingdom over a creationist exhibit in the National Trust information cerntre for the Giant's Causeway. This prompts Andrew Brown to some interesting reflections.
Creationism isn't a kind of benevolent nonsense . . . It's malevolent, and it makes sense about society. It says that the bastards run the world, and they will lie and cheat and persecute to keep their power. Science is almost irrelevant in this context – certainly, no YEC can take seriously the idea that scientists are primarily motivated by the love of truth and so they cannot engage with science as it is actually practised. But it's not completely irrelevant. There is one myth of science that bears on creationist hatred. This is the claim that modern science shows that human beings don't matter. In one modern form, it says we don't even exist, that we're "vast lumbering robots built by genes" (Richard Dawkins) or "An animal infested with memes" (artificial intelligence philospher Daniel Dennett); in older forms it claimed that the individual was nothing compared to the race, or the species, or the universe as a whole.

The claim that ordinary, powerless people don't matter at all is central to our contemporary market economies, too. It is not just assembly line workers who are treated as machines. Increasingly, all of us are, even in jobs that once seemed skilled or really difficult. . .

If we are to change it, we need reasons and explanations, not just wants. And we can't get the reasons and explanations that we need without reaching outside science, and outside the market.

To the extent that creationists, too, are trying to do that, we should sympathise. The trouble is that their answer involves erecting a whole other structure of lies, with which we should not compromise.
Brown is referring to Young Earth Creationism by the unfortunate shorthand of Creationism, but he correctly diagnoses the problem with a reductionistic materialism and our market economy. What Brown doesn't point us to is where outside science and the market we are supposed to get what we need. Rather than creationism it is the Incarnation and Resurrection which for Christians gives each human being their unique and priceless worth. It is God's identification with us in the person of Jesus Christ which reveals what it means to bear the image of God (as opposed to squirrels, etc), and it is the hope of the Resurrection that proves our worth beyond any perishable part of the cosmos or quantity thereof. Please stop buying creation science magazines and instead start worshipping Jesus, then you will know the answer to the satanic dehumanising narratives of 21st century modernity.


  1. Here in TN, they have taken steps though new legislation to allow creationism back into the classroom. This law turns the clock back nearly 100 years here in the seemingly unprogressive South and is simply embarrassing. There is no argument against the Theory of Evolution other than that of religious doctrine. The Monkey Law only opens the door for fanatic Christianity to creep its way back into our classrooms. You can see my visual response as a Tennessean to this absurd law on my artist’s blog at with some evolutionary art and a little bit of simple logic.

  2. did you read my post or did you just want to post a link to your own blog?

  3. I have read your post and noticed in your reference to Andrew Brown, that he either has not read any context for his Dawkins or Dennett quotations, or is purposefully misleading his readers to think that Dawkins or Dennett would propose that "human beings don't matter."

  4. Hi Beau

    You are right they wouldn't say that, but it is the logical conclusion of a materialistic worldview.

    you might enjoy, or not, this


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That one time Jesus got the Bible wrong

It's so typical isn't it? You are preaching all day long, training your disciples, sparring with the Pharisees, encouraging the poor and down trodden, healing the sick and casting out demons, all day, day after day, and even when you go up a mountain to get a rest the crowds hunt you down and follow you up, and then the one time you get a bit muddled up with some of the details of a biblical text . . . that is the one they write down in the first gospel - verbatim. At least Matthew and Luke had the good sense to do some editing. But Mark, he always had his eye on giving the public the "historical Jesus" whoever that is supposed to be . . . warts and all. Thanks a lot Mark!

Some think I made the mistake on purpose, just to show the Pharisees up.

For some there is no mistake worth mentioning, only a slightly ambiguous turn of phrase.

Others think I am doing something tricky with Abiathar's name, getting him to figuratively stand in for the priesthood.

It really has…

Thor Ragnarok and Parihaka: Postcolonial Apocalypse

Thor: Ragnarok is a riot of colour, sound, violence, humour, sci-fi and fantasy. As a piece of entertainment it is the best Marvel has produced so far. As in many of Taika Waititi's films the plot often seems secondary to the humour and a number of quirky moments seemed only to serve for a quick giggle. I left the theatre overwhelmed by the sensory experience, but ultimately unimpressed by any deeper meaning.

It wasn't until the second morning after my trip to the movies that I woke to the realisation that the movie could function as a profound postcolonial metaphor (I do some of my best thinking while alseep, also it can take me a while for the penny to drop). Unfortunately a quick google showed me that I was neither the first, nor the second to have this thought.

[Spoiler Alert!]

It's easy to miss with all the other stuff going on but Thor undergoes a postcolonial awakening during the film as he slowly realises that his beloved Asgard and its dominion of the nine realms …

Dale Martin does Mark

Dale Martin is an important and frequently controversial NT scholar. Those of us who can't make it to Yale to hear him teach can access some of his lectures, in fact his entire introduction to the NT course, through the magic of the internet.

Here he is holding forth on Mark . . .