Skip to main content

Thesis Now Online

Discovering Paul’s Theological Ethic in 1 Corinthians 6:12-20

My MTh thesis is now available as a PDF online. Read and enjoy! If you are new to the blog why not add me to your feed reader, you never know, you might like it and you can always delete me if you don't. 

My thesis conclusion is here and my examiners' comments are here if you want to do some research before diving right in. 

PS. If you do read it and find any mistakes or bones of contention !


  1. The link leads to a page that says, "Sorry, the page (or document) you have requested is not available." Could you upload it again? Thanks.

  2. oh dear, sorry, it is working for me so i don't know what the porblem is. assuming it is just you email me and i'll just email you the PDF. that goes for anyone else, happy to email it. :-)

  3. I got the same message. I was just about to link to this post, too!

  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  5. OK, i've tried a different link, so if you have the time please try it and tell me if it works, but i have also emailed you all the pdf as well, cos i'm helpful like that... :-)

  6. Hi Jonathan. Thanks for putting this online. I should probably read the whole thesis and give it the attention it deserves, but, for the moment, I have read the section on the supposed slogan of 1 Cor 6:12, and have a question. Do you think that one or more Corinthians had accused Paul of not being free (1 Cor 9:1)? If so, would that help to explain 1 Cor 6:12? That is to say, is Paul in 1 Cor 6:12 defending himself against the charge that he is not libertarian enough?

    If I have read you correctly, you propose that Paul in 1 Cor 6:12 is offering himself as an example for the Corinthians to follow. Doesn't this require that he expected the libertarian Corinthians to acknowledge him as an example to be followed? And if he could indeed assume that they would automatically want to follow his example, why was it necessary for him to ask them to imitate him (1 Cor 4:16; 11:1)?

    Perhaps you can help me think all this through.

    The elimination of the slogan in this verse is an attractive idea. I had never really questioned it before. Are there any slogans in 1 Cor that you buy?

  7. Hi Richard, thanks for your questions. To be blunt, i have a lot more work to do on 1 Cor if i was to answer your questions with any confidence. but here's a guess:

    Regarding 1 Cor 9, you might be onto something there.

    Regarding offering himself as an example I think Paul may just be applying a standard rhetorical move and I don't know how much can be read into it. Paul possibly thought he did still have influence at this stage and it was more a matter of misunderstanding (cf. 5:9-13). But by the time of some or all of 2 Cor he now realises it is a crisis of authority more than understanding.

    Regarding slogans, i think the whole case for other slogans in 1 Cor is built upon the undisputed fact that 6:12 and 7:1 contain slogans, if they don't then I think the case for other slogans is all but anihilated.

    thanks for the questions, much appreciated :-)


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

That one time Jesus got the Bible wrong

It's so typical isn't it? You are preaching all day long, training your disciples, sparring with the Pharisees, encouraging the poor and down trodden, healing the sick and casting out demons, all day, day after day, and even when you go up a mountain to get a rest the crowds hunt you down and follow you up, and then the one time you get a bit muddled up with some of the details of a biblical text . . . that is the one they write down in the first gospel - verbatim. At least Matthew and Luke had the good sense to do some editing. But Mark, he always had his eye on giving the public the "historical Jesus" whoever that is supposed to be . . . warts and all. Thanks a lot Mark!

Some think I made the mistake on purpose, just to show the Pharisees up.

For some there is no mistake worth mentioning, only a slightly ambiguous turn of phrase.

Others think I am doing something tricky with Abiathar's name, getting him to figuratively stand in for the priesthood.

It really has…

Thor Ragnarok and Parihaka: Postcolonial Apocalypse

Thor: Ragnarok is a riot of colour, sound, violence, humour, sci-fi and fantasy. As a piece of entertainment it is the best Marvel has produced so far. As in many of Taika Waititi's films the plot often seems secondary to the humour and a number of quirky moments seemed only to serve for a quick giggle. I left the theatre overwhelmed by the sensory experience, but ultimately unimpressed by any deeper meaning.

It wasn't until the second morning after my trip to the movies that I woke to the realisation that the movie could function as a profound postcolonial metaphor (I do some of my best thinking while alseep, also it can take me a while for the penny to drop). Unfortunately a quick google showed me that I was neither the first, nor the second to have this thought.

[Spoiler Alert!]

It's easy to miss with all the other stuff going on but Thor undergoes a postcolonial awakening during the film as he slowly realises that his beloved Asgard and its dominion of the nine realms …

Dale Martin does Mark

Dale Martin is an important and frequently controversial NT scholar. Those of us who can't make it to Yale to hear him teach can access some of his lectures, in fact his entire introduction to the NT course, through the magic of the internet.

Here he is holding forth on Mark . . .